Skip to content

What Meat Loaf Wouldn’t Do for Love

January 18, 2013
Meat Loaf  as a Douchebag Steve meme

Meat Loaf as a Douchebag Steve meme

Being a songwriter and Meat Loaf fan, people often ask me, “Ryan, when Meat says ‘I would do anything for love, but I won’t do that,’ what does he mean by ‘that’?”

Well, the first thing you have to remember when you’re listening to any Meat Loaf album is, while Meat is singing his loaves off about love, the lyricist — an inordinately strange man named Jim Steinman, who reportedly never removes his black leather gloves, even while playing piano — is actually writing about sex. So the two words are largely interchangeable, and the title of the song more accurately becomes “I Would Do Anything for [Sex], but I Won’t Do That.”

The “that” changes many times throughout the song (all listed in my next paragraph), with the final “that” being most representative of the aforementioned dichotomy between the song’s writer and its performer. After Meat Loaf assures his lady friend (vocally portrayed by Patti Russo) of all the things he would do for her, she fears that it was just a fling, that Meat will forget his promises, and that sooner or later he’ll be “screwing around” behind her back. Bearing in mind the interpretation above, it’s easy to understand Meat Loaf’s retort: “[Baby], I would do anything for [sex], but I won’t [cheat on you]” for it.

Meat Loaf's pie graph

Other things Meat won’t do: Meat Loaf will never lie to you. He will never forget the way you feel right now. He will never forgive himself if the two of you don’t go all the way tonight. He will never turn back. He will never do it better than he does it with you. He will never stop dreaming of you every night of his life. He won’t forget everything after a while or see that it’s time to move on. And he won’t cheat on you.

And now you know what Meat Loaf would do for love…

Meat Loaf singing his loaves off

…and what he would not do just for sex.

From → Blog

One Comment
  1. Tisa permalink

    The universality of poetry is the interpretation variable. “That” allows a personal appeal to every listener/reader. Well said, Ryan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: